Your company's all in one AI work tool. Code, test, write, plan — Claude handles it all and makes you defocus from customers.
| Claude can | And hence | Instead Testpert will |
|---|---|---|
| Claude wins Deliver code, testing and everything else |
Suitable for everyone in the company | Focused mostly on testing — who wants testing when bug-free code from Claude is available? |
| Claude wins Cheaper |
$20/month per seat — always pick the cheaper option to scale | Relatively expensive. Why spend more when Claude is Superman and Superwoman combined? |
| Claude wins Is a work tool |
A lot of work can be done | A "value tool" focused on customer growth. Sounds too good to be true — safer with Claude. |
| Claude wins Improve individual productivity |
Everyone will be differently productive (if that's your goal) | A tool for the team. Testpert fails to understand we ultimately root for individual heroes. |
| Claude wins Give value if you know how to prompt |
Otherwise you'll look average | Forces people to learn the product and understand customers. Which age is Testpert in? |
| Claude wins Make average people copy smart prompts |
You won't know who's really smart and who's average | People who know the customer will stand out — very dangerous for average people. Claude is friendlier. |
| Claude wins Make team members rely on Claude confidently |
You'll assign more as team members become useless over time | Brings reasonability, balances speed with quality. Who wants that? Claude makes people faster! |
| Claude wins Generate more tests |
Who cares if necessary — Claude gave it, so it must be right | Focuses on coverage and might actually reduce tests. Looks anti-testing. |
| Claude wins Generate more test scripts |
Spend time fixing flaky scripts — a great AI career! | Focuses people on how customers experience the product. More automation with Claude. Yay! |
Most teams are officially using AI with Claude. Prior to that they were dating ChatGPT, Codex,
or Lovable or CoPilot. Now organisations want it official.
Many organisations love dating. They defocus from customers. This is why the number of organisations surviving the future is getting bleaker.
Testpert is the choice if the focus has to go back on the customer. Want productivity without a clue on the customer? Claude does great!
Claude works perfectly for the 98%.
Testpert in the age of AI forces people to think more deeply about customers.
While this is a refreshing take — let's be real. Who really wants it?
Testers and SDETs don't want to test anymore. Testpert makes CXOs care about quality that actually affects customers.
Most people want to grow their career. Claude on your profile is sexier than Testpert. Obviously. 98% of IT is here for the next job, not customers.
Testpert digs deeper into why a feature is built. Doesn't even sound like a testing tool — because it isn't. It's a customer intelligence tool.
People forget their predecessors worked hard to be experts. IT now chases speed over mastery. Expertise is slow — and reliable. If planes were built by people chasing speed, none of us would be flying.
Testing was the need of a Business — which got passed on to Product — which got passed on to Engineering. Testpert asks: what if we stopped passing the buck and actually owned it?
For teams serious about customers, quality, and building something that lasts. The dating phase was fun. Time to commit.
Yes for Testpert →Built with Claude — because it's a static page and we could. Our product though? Humans + Testpert + Automation. We chase excellence and customer value. You chase speed and productivity. Different planets, aren't we?